Hi, Cesclie. I do think, we're actually on the same page. In my eyes the confusion seems to come from different interpretations of the words. Yes, the "no!" could be interpreted as a form of punishment as the dog gets deprived of doing sthg he'd like to do.
With "no corrections" , including verbal and physical ones, I meant we'd confuse and in some cases perhaps even demotivate the dog. I myself start training houserules etc. by making the dog have as much success as possible. This I can do by means of giving him no chance to commit an error. Having him tethered or having him kept in a clearly restricted area, he has not much chances for errors. I can almost each time reward him. Like this he learns what I want from him. Once he's got it i can start with verbal and a bit later with physical corrections. By continuing this I can also - very gradually - give him a bit more freedom, proofing his learned behaviors on another spot, over time in another room, later on outside and with a long line.
Yes, you can call tethering or restricting as Punishment. This is one of those questions of interpretation of a word. I can agree with you without problem in this point, I myself would just interprete it differently. In a natural pack the puppies are kept near the mother. If they try to go away, she'll grab them softly and put them near to her again. I myself wouldn't call this punishment, although I agree it is a restriction. Or correction.
For me correction is sthg stronger and it has to come from ME. For example a dog is pulling when I want to walk with him. I say "No!" and if he doesn't obey I stand still. If he goes on pulling it means he himswelf is "punishing" him, not I.Like this he learns: Oh, pulling is not worth it, if I return to her the continuation orf walking will happen much quicker. Or I change direction. He doesn't follow me, I never drag, but go on walking, logical that the leash stretches, which is uncomfortable. But it is he who does this to himself. Like this he learns, it is more comfortable to follow me.
An actual correction for me would be much stronger. Again: adapted to the individual dog. With a softer dog I have to use a lower correction level, adapted to him. For a dog who is not impressed by a correction level 3 I will have to give one of level 5 or more. I have to find out what effect a level such or such has on him.
This description is only to show you how I am doing it. Of course everything is simplified as I can't list here all of the rules he's got to learn.
Actually I should especially name the distractions and how to deal with them. It is so diffferent from dog to dog. In short: If I can, I avoid distractions which are of too high a level for that particular dog.I start with very low levels at home, later on I try the comparable level outside. I try to tackle with them by making myself more interesting than the distraction, a little game, an exercise, trick he loves and so on, food sometime yes, but not only this, it must be a little event. I want him to keep focussed on me inspite of the distraction. Often easier said than done!
I hope I've described all this clearly enough, but don't hesitate to ask or comment, I also like discussions and like to hear about how others are handling their dogs.